Screener
LDSF vs KMAR
First Trust Low Duration Strategic Focus ETF vs Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- LDSF is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LDSF is classified as fixed income, while KMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LDSF follows a active selection strategy; KMAR uses structured outcome.
- LDSF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LDSF | KMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $160M | $35M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.61% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.06% | 9.38% |
| Max drawdown | -8.56% | -10.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LDSF and KMAR
Explore further