Screener
LGH vs TUG
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF vs STF Tactical Growth ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.35% less per year.
- LGH is significantly larger than TUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LGH is classified as alternative, while TUG is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- LGH follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGH | TUG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $555M | $42M |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 0.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -29.60% | -22.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGH and TUG
Explore further