Screener
TUG vs QQH
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TUG costs 0.33% less per year.
- QQH is significantly larger than TUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUG is classified as mixed asset, while QQH is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $697M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUG and QQH
Explore further