Screener
LGH vs TUGN
HCM Defender 500 Index ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.35% less per year.
- LGH is significantly larger than TUGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LGH follows a tactical allocation strategy; TUGN uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LGH | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $555M | $78M |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.9% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.64% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -29.60% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LGH and TUGN
Explore further