Screener
LITP vs METL
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- LITP costs 0.34% less per year.
- LITP follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| LITP | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $95M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.29% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +202.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -0.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.44% | — |
| Max drawdown | -74.72% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LITP and METL
Explore further