Screener
LITP vs SGDM
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- SGDM costs 0.19% less per year.
- SGDM is significantly larger than LITP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LITP follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SGDM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SGDM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LITP | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $660M |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 5.29% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +202.1% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -0.5% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.16 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 58.44% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -74.72% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LITP and SGDM
Explore further