Screener
MARS vs BOUT
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF vs Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- MARS costs 0.05% less per year.
- MARS is classified as equity, while BOUT is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MARS follows a active selection strategy; BOUT uses structured outcome.
- BOUT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MARS | BOUT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $16M |
| Since | 2026 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +36.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 20.75% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -36.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MARS and BOUT
Explore further