Screener
MCH vs APIE
Matthews China Active ETF vs ActivePassive International Equity ETF
Key differences
- APIE costs 0.34% less per year.
- APIE is significantly larger than MCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCH covers emerging markets markets; APIE covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, APIE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCH | APIE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | +17.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.91% | 16.13% |
| Max drawdown | -40.53% | -15.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCH and APIE
Explore further