Screener
MCH vs APUE
Matthews China Active ETF vs ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- APUE costs 0.48% less per year.
- APUE is significantly larger than MCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCH covers emerging markets markets; APUE covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, APUE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCH | APUE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.31% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $2.4B |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 0.79% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +30.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.2% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.39 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.91% | 12.36% |
| Max drawdown | -40.53% | -18.83% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCH and APUE
Explore further