Screener
MCHS vs MINV
Matthews China Innovators Active ETF vs Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Key differences
- MINV costs 0.10% less per year.
- MINV is significantly larger than MCHS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCHS covers emerging markets markets; MINV covers asia pacific.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHS | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $143M |
| Since | 2024 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 2.72% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +71.2% | +81.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +31.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.27% | 24.43% |
| Max drawdown | -23.75% | -23.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHS and MINV
Explore further