Screener
MEAR vs MINT
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.10% less per year.
- MINT is significantly larger than MEAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, MINT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MINT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | MINT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $15.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.05 | 4.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 0.27% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -4.62% |
Similar to MEAR and MINT
Explore further