Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MEMX vs GEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

GEM

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$1.7B

Key differences

Both MEMX and GEM are equity ETFs. MEMX charges 0.79% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: MEMX follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.

  • MEMX follows a active selection strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
  • GEM costs 0.44% less per year.
  • GEM is much larger than MEMX. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

MEMXGEM
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$50M$1.7B
Since20232015
Dividend yield1.55%1.85%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex enhanced
CAGR 1Y+56.3%+41.2%
CAGR 3Y+24.5%+21.9%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y1.121.00
Volatility 1Y22.75%20.62%
Max drawdown-19.27%-37.02%

Similar to MEMX and GEM