Screener
METL vs ICOP
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF
Key differences
- ICOP costs 0.52% less per year.
- ICOP is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; ICOP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | ICOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $429M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +95.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 36.97% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -38.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and ICOP
Explore further