Screener
METL vs LITP
Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF vs Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Key differences
- LITP costs 0.34% less per year.
- METL follows a active selection strategy; LITP uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| METL | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $65M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.29% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +202.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -0.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 58.44% |
| Max drawdown | -27.39% | -74.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to METL and LITP
Explore further