Screener
MFSV vs REVS
MFS Active Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Key differences
- REVS costs 0.25% less per year.
- MFSV follows a active selection strategy; REVS uses index tracking.
- REVS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MFSV | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $443M | $284M |
| Since | 2024 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +15.7% | +28.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.31% | 11.62% |
| Max drawdown | -12.74% | -37.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MFSV and REVS
Explore further