Screener
MINV vs DVYA
Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- DVYA costs 0.30% less per year.
- MINV follows a active selection strategy; DVYA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MINV | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $143M | $70M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.14% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +81.1% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +31.9% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.43% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -23.49% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MINV and DVYA
Explore further