Screener
MLPA vs EIPX
Global X MLP ETF vs FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
Key differences
- MLPA costs 0.18% less per year.
- MLPA is significantly larger than EIPX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EIPX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MLPA | EIPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.77% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $532M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.94% | 2.61% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +35.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.76% | 11.02% |
| Max drawdown | -74.03% | -15.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MLPA and EIPX
Explore further