Screener
PIPE vs AMZA
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs InfraCap MLP ETF
Key differences
- PIPE costs 0.97% less per year.
- AMZA is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIPE covers global markets; AMZA covers north america.
- AMZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIPE | AMZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $464M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 7.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +21.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 17.74% |
| Max drawdown | -15.69% | -86.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIPE and AMZA
Explore further