Screener
MTRA vs IPKW
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- IPKW is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; IPKW uses index tracking.
- IPKW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | IPKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $530M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.37% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -47.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and IPKW
Explore further