Screener
MUNI vs BOND
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MUNI costs 0.19% less per year.
- MUNI follows a index tracking strategy; BOND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, BOND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MUNI | BOND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $7.9B |
| Since | 2009 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 5.17% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.4% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +0.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.03 | 0.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.26% | 4.00% |
| Max drawdown | -11.16% | -19.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MUNI and BOND
Explore further