Screener
MXI vs IBAT
iShares Global Materials ETF vs iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.08% less per year.
- MXI is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MXI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MXI | IBAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $65M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 0.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +117.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.38% | 25.82% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -28.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MXI and IBAT
Explore further