Screener
MXI vs SMN
iShares Global Materials ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Materials
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.56% less per year.
- MXI is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MXI covers global markets; SMN covers north america.
- MXI follows a index tracking strategy; SMN uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, MXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MXI | SMN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $325M | $3M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 4.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.9% | -31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.9% | -16.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.7% | -14.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.61 | -0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.47% | 34.14% |
| Max drawdown | -39.52% | -95.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MXI and SMN
Explore further