Screener
SMN vs IYM
ProShares UltraShort Materials vs iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.57% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than SMN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMN follows a inverse strategy; IYM uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMN | IYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2007 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 4.58% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.2% | +40.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -16.8% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.9% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 34.14% | 18.73% |
| Max drawdown | -95.39% | -42.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMN and IYM
Explore further