Screener
NANR vs TURF
State Street SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF vs T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- NANR costs 0.09% less per year.
- NANR is significantly larger than TURF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- NANR is classified as alternative, while TURF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- NANR follows a index tracking strategy; TURF uses active selection.
- NANR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NANR | TURF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $795M | $117M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | — |
| Max drawdown | -49.15% | -6.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to NANR and TURF
Explore further