Screener
NBJP vs GEM
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
Both NBJP and GEM are equity ETFs. NBJP charges 0.50% a year and GEM 0.35%. The main difference: NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- NBJP follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- NBJP covers the Asia-Pacific region; GEM covers emerging markets.
- GEM costs 0.15% less per year.
- GEM is much larger than NBJP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| NBJP | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.91% | 1.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +41.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 20.62% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -37.02% |
Similar to NBJP and GEM
Explore further