Screener
OAEM vs FFND
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- FFND costs 0.25% less per year.
- OAEM follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FFND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| OAEM | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.25% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $100M | $99M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.63% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.5% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.18% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -17.05% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OAEM and FFND
Explore further