Screener
OALC vs FFND
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- OALC costs 0.51% less per year.
- OALC follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OALC | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $220M | $99M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.7% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.29 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.05% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OALC and FFND
Explore further