Screener
OASC vs FFND
OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF vs One Global ETF
Key differences
- OASC costs 0.31% less per year.
- OASC follows a index tracking strategy; FFND uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| OASC | FFND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $99M |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.48% | 0.62% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.6% | +23.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.21% | 12.97% |
| Max drawdown | -26.99% | -47.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to OASC and FFND
Explore further