Screener
PBD vs CGW
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Key differences
- CGW costs 0.17% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +10.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -35.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and CGW
Explore further