Screener
PBD vs FRNW
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- FRNW costs 0.36% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, FRNW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | FRNW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $141M |
| Since | 2007 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +95.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 25.46% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -59.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and FRNW
Explore further