Screener
PBD vs QCLN
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
Key differences
- QCLN costs 0.16% less per year.
- QCLN is significantly larger than PBD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PBD covers global markets; QCLN covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, QCLN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | QCLN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $739M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 0.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.4% | +118.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +12.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.36% | 34.72% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -71.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and QCLN
Explore further