Screener
PBD vs RSPG
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.35% less per year.
- PBD covers global markets; RSPG covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBD | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $208M | $624M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.3% | +52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.1% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.23% | 21.47% |
| Max drawdown | -75.44% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBD and RSPG
Explore further