Screener
RSPG vs PBW
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.24% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $447M |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.8% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.47% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and PBW
Explore further