Screener
PBW vs HAP
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- HAP costs 0.23% less per year.
- PBW covers north america markets; HAP covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, HAP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.41% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $316M |
| Since | 2005 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +159.6% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.9% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.35 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.43% | 14.90% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -44.14% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and HAP
Explore further