Screener
PBW vs RSPG
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.24% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PBW | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.64% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $447M | $624M |
| Since | 2005 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.71% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +150.5% | +52.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.6% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.29% | 21.47% |
| Max drawdown | -89.06% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PBW and RSPG
Explore further