Screener
RSPG vs PBD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF vs Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.35% less per year.
- RSPG covers north america markets; PBD covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RSPG | PBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.40% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $624M | $208M |
| Since | 2006 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.89% | 1.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +52.8% | +88.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +8.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.1% | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.47% | 23.23% |
| Max drawdown | -73.17% | -75.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RSPG and PBD
Explore further