Screener
PFIG vs EPRF
Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PFIG costs 0.25% less per year.
- PFIG is classified as fixed income, while EPRF is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- PFIG follows a index tracking strategy; EPRF uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, PFIG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PFIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PFIG | EPRF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $72M |
| Since | 2011 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 4.37% | 6.08% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.3% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.5% | -1.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.40 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.09% | 7.59% |
| Max drawdown | -15.73% | -26.82% |
Similar to PFIG and EPRF
Explore further