Screener
PGRI vs IWL
Putnam International Stock ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- PGRI is classified as fixed income, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- PGRI covers emerging markets markets; IWL covers north america.
Side-by-side comparison
| PGRI | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $2.1B |
| Since | — | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PGRI and IWL
Explore further