Screener
PHO vs IGF
Invesco Water Resources ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.20% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than PHO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PHO covers north america markets; IGF covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, IGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PHO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2005 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.6% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.9% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -34.92% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PHO and IGF
Explore further