Screener
PID vs OMFS
Invesco International Dividend Achievers ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- OMFS costs 0.14% less per year.
- PID is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PID covers global markets; OMFS covers north america.
- PID follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, OMFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PID has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PID | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.53% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $929M | $275M |
| Since | 2005 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.28% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.3% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.73 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.71% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -46.07% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PID and OMFS
Explore further