Screener
PIPE vs MLPA
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Global X MLP ETF
Key differences
- MLPA is significantly larger than PIPE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PIPE covers global markets; MLPA covers north america.
- PIPE follows a active selection strategy; MLPA uses index tracking.
- MLPA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PIPE | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.77% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | 6.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.4% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.18% | 11.95% |
| Max drawdown | -15.69% | -74.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PIPE and MLPA
Explore further