Screener
PPI vs CCOR
Astoria Real Asset ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- PPI costs 0.71% less per year.
- PPI is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PPI follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, PPI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PPI | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $159M | $28M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.7% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.78% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -24.54% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PPI and CCOR
Explore further