Screener
PSCE vs PBW
Invesco S&P SmallCap Energy ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PSCE costs 0.35% less per year.
- PBW is significantly larger than PSCE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCE has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| PSCE | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.29% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $122M | $447M |
| Since | 2010 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.6% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.9% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.8% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.52 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.77% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -90.70% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to PSCE and PBW
Explore further