Screener
PVI vs SMMU
Invesco Floating Rate Municipal Income ETF vs PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- PVI costs 0.10% less per year.
- SMMU is significantly larger than PVI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- PVI follows a index tracking strategy; SMMU uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, SMMU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| PVI | SMMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $1.1B |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.16% | 2.79% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.0% | +4.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.9% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.40 | 0.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.62% | 1.03% |
| Max drawdown | -1.16% | -5.09% |
Similar to PVI and SMMU
Explore further