Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QDTE vs BOUT

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Roundhill Investments

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$828M

BOUT

Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF

Capital-FORCE ETF

Annual cost

0.80%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

  • BOUT costs 0.16% less per year.
  • QDTE is significantly larger than BOUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • QDTE follows a option income strategy; BOUT uses structured outcome.
  • BOUT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

QDTEBOUT
Annual cost (TER)0.96%0.80%
Fund size (AUM)$828M$16M
Since20242018
Dividend yield45.82%0.28%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomestructured outcome
CAGR 1Y+39.9%+34.2%
CAGR 3YN/A+16.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+7.6%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.70
Volatility 1Y14.90%20.64%
Max drawdown-22.86%-36.75%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to QDTE and BOUT