Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

QDTE vs INRO

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF

QDTE

Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

Annual cost

0.96%

Fund size

$828M

INRO

iShares U.S. Industry Rotation Active ETF

Annual cost

0.42%

Fund size

$31M

Key differences

  • INRO costs 0.54% less per year.
  • QDTE is significantly larger than INRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • QDTE is classified as alternative, while INRO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • QDTE follows a option income strategy; INRO uses index tracking.

Side-by-side comparison

QDTEINRO
Annual cost (TER)0.96%0.42%
Fund size (AUM)$828M$31M
Since20242024
Dividend yield45.82%0.69%
Asset classalternativeequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+42.8%+34.5%
CAGR 3YN/AN/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/AN/A
Volatility 1Y14.95%12.93%
Max drawdown-22.86%-20.02%

Similar to QDTE and INRO