Screener
QIS vs HARD
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
Key differences
- HARD costs 0.43% less per year.
- QIS is classified as alternative, while HARD is commodity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | HARD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $118M |
| Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -41.5% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +14.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.25% | 26.20% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -13.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and HARD
Explore further