Screener
QIS vs ISMF
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
Key differences
- ISMF costs 0.41% less per year.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; ISMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | ISMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $57M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 2.50% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | -41.5% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.25% | 7.87% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -4.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and ISMF
Explore further