Screener
QIS vs IMF
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF vs Invesco Managed Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- IMF costs 0.56% less per year.
- IMF is significantly larger than QIS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QIS follows a multi strategy strategy; IMF uses managed futures.
Side-by-side comparison
| QIS | IMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.21% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $54M | $301M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | managed futures |
| CAGR 1Y | -41.5% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 37.25% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -55.49% | -15.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QIS and IMF
Explore further