Screener
QPX vs RHRX
AdvisorShares Q Dynamic Growth ETF vs RH Tactical Rotation ETF
Key differences
- RHRX costs 0.36% less per year.
- QPX is classified as mixed asset, while RHRX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- QPX follows a active selection strategy; RHRX uses option income.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QPX | RHRX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.74% | 1.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $34M |
| Since | 2020 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.6% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.98% | 13.26% |
| Max drawdown | -34.75% | -25.33% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QPX and RHRX
Explore further